Kingdom Of Heaven
Last night I finished viewing The Kingdom of Heaven. It gives a pretty ugly picture of the Crusades of the 12th Century, and rightly so I imagine. It is hard for me to fathom that so many people can so readily be motivated to kill others in the name of God, especially in the name of my God. I know that the core message of the Christian faith has much to say about warfare and the overthrow of kingdoms. But such is not accomplished with sword and guns. Jesus did not hammer nails into the hands of his enemies. The war is won with the mighty weapon of the gospel. Christianity, rightly understood, is truly about destroying our enemy- not by bombarding him with deadly weapons, but fundamentally transforming him from within.
The movie portrays a Church that apparently knows nothing about loving people into the Kingdom. Instead, a bloody sword is used. It is disturbing that millions of otherwise decent people would so readily leave home and family to march off to a holy war. Would I die for my faith? I will discuss this in more detail at a later time, but I would like to think so. But, would I want you to die for my faith? I would kill no one because his faith differs from mine. It just so readily makes moral sense to me that you would have the right to believe or disbelieve as you choose. If you are to be judged, there is One greater and more capable than I who will accomplish that task. It is not the task of the church, nor the government, and God forbid that the two should ever work together to do the bidding of the Almighty.
Now, if you are hellbent upon killing me because of your faith, then I will recognize that and I will stop you if I can. And such does seem to be the case with many. We can refer to social and political inequalities of our world. But, there is a fundamental question to ask, with a fundamental answer. What would motivate an otherwise bright and healthy person to strap a bomb onto her body and detonate herself inside a crowded marketplace? And we know the answer- religion. This person has bought into a convoluted and inferior religious understanding that murderous martyrdom is the surefire pathway to the Kingdom of Heaven. It is selfish, evil, and truly ungodly. But it is parcel to the second-largest religion of our day. And it was parcel to the Crusaders portrayed in The Kingdom of Heaven. The church was authoritarian. Centuries of doctrine and culture taught the people that it could not be questioned. Complex geo-political issues were allowed to be defined by the church alone. And so men and boys were marched off to war, to die for God. It sounds a lot like the Muslim culture of our day. And I wonder if the so very ugly brand of Islam, of today, will similarly evolve into something better?
“Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight…” – John 18:36
FOOD FOR THOUGHT:
*Have you seen this movie?
*How, in God’s name, can one be so very religious and yet treat human life so very cheaply?
*Is it a fair comparison: Modern-day Islamic Fundamentalism to the Christian Crusaders of the Middle Ages?
*Would you die for your faith?
03.30.07 (12:06 pm) [
edit]
19
Comments
Meeting Margaret Mitchell
Yesterday I toured the Margaret Mitchell House & Museum in Atlanta. She is singularly noted in history as the author of the epic Gone With The Wind. The book was a best seller of its time, and gained even greater fame when made into a movie starring Clark Gable and Vivian Leigh. As a child I sat through the very long film a couple of times at the insistance of my parents, and have not ventured near the movie since. But now I will most likely see it again. I would like to think that Clark Gable reminds most people of myself, but for the mustache. Except, I would have probably given Scarlett another chance.
The house is much like the life of Margaret Mitchell, nothing spectacular on the surface. She affectionately referred to it as "The Dump". Actually it was a home converted into several apartments. She and her husband, John Marsh, lived their entire marriage in Apt. 1. What I saw was a cramped and modest dwelling. I understand that, while Mitchell was quite rich, she never spent much on herself. Such hints that she probably did not take herself too seriously. As I looked around at the recreated setting of late-40's furniture, I thought a bit of my own home furnishings, mostly a collection of garage sale items and castoffs. It makes me smile to think my lifestyle to be similar to a great author.
Very few of the items in the apartment were authentic to Mitchell. It seems her actual estate belongs to an elderly nephew and neice, both single and both hoarding her possessions for who-knows-what. What a waste. Of course we would all want to see the authentic toaster and genuine silverware used by Margaret for breakfast, perhaps the very day she penned a vivid description of Tara. It would be a sad loss for posterity if these priceless items were seized by a nursing home.
I read with interest many of the clippings about her life. There were hints of her genius: she wrote stories as a child, and was a reporter for the Atlanta Journal. As a young woman she was apparently shy, but with a flair for the rebellious. Her first husband was a bootlegger and alcoholic. The marriage lasted a year. And one item authentic to Mitchell was a photograph hanging in her bedroom of a embellished photo of a naked woman, likely hanging there with the intended purpose to shock. She wrote Gone With The Wind in secret, ever convinced she was not a worthy author. Many years later and with great hesitation, she passed the manuscript to a prospective publisher. It was an instant hit, and made her famous and wealthy.
An interesting and seemingly juxtaposed part of the museum was a display of back-and-white photos from the civil rights movement of MLK. It seems Mitchell came into proximity with King but once, when as a ten-year-old he sang with a children's choir at the opening of the movie in Atlanta. Many criticized Mitchell and the movie for unfair portrayal of blacks. Few realized that Mitchell, although a product of the white establisment of her time, worked diligently for racial justice. She encouraged integration of the Atlanta police force. And she supported Morehouse College, personally funding the educations of over fifty students who would become medical professionals.
Perhaps Margaret Mitchell could and should have done more. She was tremendously gifted, and the timing of her life was fortuitous. Certainly she should have written more; we are the poorer because, for whatever reason, she did not. But I think I would have liked her.
As we were leaving in the church van, the group of elderly ladies were having a spirited debate about the best way to get home. Finally, one of them asked the driver-myself- what I thought. I looked her in the eye, raised an eyebrow, and replied, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a...... (everybody quietened to listen)... care. I'm just the driver." Our next trip will be the Gone With The Wind Museum, just a few miles north of Atlanta. Should be interesting.
03.23.07 (2:02 pm) [
edit]
20
Comments
A Lesson From Borat
"...in my country men would go crazy for these two [women], but not so much this one [points to pastor's wife]." The pastor did not reply, and certainly did not smile. Later, when Borat invited his prostitute friend to the genteel gathering, the minister quickly dismissed himself and the hostess told the man from Khazikstan he was no longer welcome. Now I do not know how much of the movie was staged and how much was real interaction, but I truly enjoyed this part. The good, Southern, church-going folks were being patently paternalistic to a backwards third-worlder. And Borat played it for all it was worth. That was funny.
I've read that the nation of Kazakstan has vigorously protested the movie. And while it does poke gentle stereotypical fun at the country, the true objects of ridicule are traditional elements of American society- things many of us hold dearly. And I am a bit troubled to find that the movie encourages me to laugh along as matters I should hold sacred are ridiculed. When he buffoons the national anthem, I do not laugh. And I am particularly disturbed with his blaspheming of a Pentecostal revival meeting. I'm not Charismatic and I certainly have theological differences with many of their ways. But I believe this movie imposes itself upon a gathering of sincere folks who are minding their own business. When the character of Borat "walks the sawdust trail" to give his heart to Jesus, he is basically lampooning what is, to millions of Christians including myself, the most sacred experience of life. It's not funny.
And then I get to thinking... During the movie, I found much that was worth a hearty belly-laugh. Jews were stereotyped as Muslim-killers. Gays were mercilessly ridiculed, as were fat people. So were patriotic folk, and blacks. It was only as the efforts of ridicule were pointed toward conservative Christians that I found myself indignant. Perhaps the gentle revelation of such inward moral inconsistency is what this silly little movie is really about? It's possible.
03.19.07 (10:07 pm) [
edit]
24
Comments
Phone Call From Hell
Time to vent.
I checked the voice mail this morning to find an urgent call from a stranger. He left his name and both numbers, and asked me to please call soon. There was the high probability that he was a sales person, but I returned the call anyhow. He spoke almost breathlessly with a sense of great conviction, and his reason for contacting me is increasingly irritating the more I think about it. He is a “friend” of one of my parishioners, and is quite concerned about his spiritual/moral well-being. And since this church member has spoken of high respect for me, this self-proclaimed Good Samaritan is thinking we can team together to correct the error of his ways.
What’s the story? My fellow church member has within his life and behaviour a matter of obvious moral inconsistency. He is a good guy, and in many ways exhibits a God-honouring lifestyle. But I agree this is not a proper thing that he has allowed to become a part of his lifestyle. He and I have talked about it in great detail. This matter needs to come to a point of resolution. And I have offered to be a helper. And I believe that my friend and his God will settle this issue. The ingredients I will offer as his pastor are advice, love, prayer, and time.
So, this morning I receive a call from his “Christian brother”. He is very concerned about the moral failings of our friend. I was so affronted by the obvious self-righteousness of the moment that I said little; just listened.
"He loves our friend."
Love is a matter of action, not a pious platitude.
"The Bible says to confront a brother who is in sin."
Then why are you talking to me, instead of him?
"God has made our friend sick because of his sin. And God will heal him if he will simply change his ways."
Oh yeah? This person has been dealing with health issues you have no appreciation of. And he has handled them with greater dignity and far more grace than I hear exhibited in your acid tongue.
"Our friend can’t go to heaven with this sin in his life."
You have far more faith in the power of human righteousness, and far less trust in the grace of God, than me and our mutual friend.
"Let’s work together to correct our friend."
Please just stay in your own little corner of Zion, and leave us alone.
What a way to start the workday!
03.15.07 (10:35 am) [
edit]
30
Comments
John Fogerty Said What?
Now I am venturing into an area where I do not belong- the interpretation of song lyrics. I’ve had a hard time understanding the words of popular songs. I can listen to a performance, focus hard and try my best to decipher the varied vocal affectations, and still walk away wondering what the heck was said. Of course, people do the same with my sermons every Sunday.
So we come to the song “Lodi”, by Creedence Clearwater Revival. I understand it was released in 1969 on the Green River album, and I remember it as the flip side of the “Bad Moon Rising” 45rpm. I would have been 14-years-old at the time, listening to WFPA radio; “Wonderful Ft. Payne, Alabama” would croak the local DJ. The station offered request line most nights, where listeners could phone in their requests and hear them on-air. Being a nerdy-punk-kid, I liked to call in early, during the news broadcast, to enjoy hearing the faint but constant ring of the phone in the background. And this did not endear me to Ned, the DJ. And I liked to make obscure requests that he hated to play. “Look At Them Beans” by Johnny Cash, and “Hanky Panky” by Tommy James and the Shondells, were favourites. Soon I was banned from the request line. Disguising my voice did not help; with about the third word Ned recognized this nerdy-punk-kid and quickly slammed down the phone. And so was the joy of being a red neck kid growing up in a small town.
One day my friend, Jimmy, was walking along and singing “Lodi”. It was a catchy song, country-rock with an edge, a roughly hewn trait that made Creedence sound so good. And most of the words were easily understood…
Just about a year ago
I set out on the road
Seekin' my fame and fortune
Lookin' for a pot of gold
Thing got bad, things got worse
I guess you will know the tune
Oh ! Lord, sucking on Lodi up again…
"What? Jimmy, did you say “sucking on Lodi up again”?"
"No. I said, “stucking on Lodi up and again”."
"What does that mean?"
"I don’t know. But that’s the words."
I was not convinced. I’m still not.
I find it interesting how, if a song has a catchy tune and a pleasant sound, we are quite willing to accept stupid lyrics, even if we have to create them. “Stucking on Lodi?” I don’t think John Fogerty, even if he were sitting on his back porch watching tambourines and elephants playing in the band, as he drawed upon a long weed, would come up with such lyrics. So, what does the song say?
The man from the magazine
Said I was on my way
Somewhere I lost connections
Ran out of songs to play
I came into town, a one night stand
Looks like my plans fell through
Oh ! Lord, Stuck in …a low diaphragm?
….shucking on low guys, again?
Here is an opinion of the song from George Starostin’s Reviews:
“And 'Lodi' has to be CCR's best philosophical song ever; again, not that it has a great melody, but John brings forth all the talents he can muster in his voice. That's probably why it sounds so unconvincing in concert - because Mr Fogerty just can't reproduce the studio sound. The story tells of a (presumably) folk singer trying his luck in different cities - and ultimately failing. Fate has spared John such a turn of events, but parts of this story are certainly autobiographical, and the convincing power of his voice is amazing - ranging from humble and quiet to all-out screaming, sometimes in prayer, sometimes in desperation, sometimes almost in self-mockery.”
I’m in agreement. I just wish to understand that one puzzling phrase.
I challenge you. Don’t Google the subject, and don’t look at the words on your dusty LP cover. Just listen to the song, and tell me what you hear. Not so easy, is it?
03.14.07 (11:05 am) [
edit]
13
Comments
Tommy
Yesterday we said goodbye to our friend Tommy. Normally I would not tell the story of a man's death and funeral on this blog; It's intended for happier matters. But I think you would like to know this special man.Tommy and his twin brother were born a little over 60 years ago. The care for crisis deliveries and premature infants at that time was not nearly as advanced as today. Thus they entered into the world with an intellectual handicap, and spent their entire lives struggling with associated challenges. I think their mother was overwhelmed by the challenge, and thus was controlling and overly protective until her death about four months ago. It was unfortunate, but I dare not judge her too harshly. It was a protection born of love, a simple and flawed mother doing her best with an overwhelming situation. She shielded them from other members of the family, and neighbors, and friends. She ordered their lives and handled every detail. And they were good sons who loved their mama. Apparently she thought she was going to live forever. She did not prepare them for life without her. She died at the age of 85, this last November.
So I tell you, after an explanation of his challenges, that Tommy was an amazing man. He enriched the lives of so many people. And we all gathered on Sunday afternoon to pay tribute to this friend. Concerning preparation, it was an easy funeral for me to conduct. A simple microphone was placed in the front of the church sanctuary, and those who would like were invited to step forward to share a few words of tribute. With the words that followed an exquisite portrait of an exceptional man was painted. A nurse spoke of his quiet dignity, as with simplicity and nobility he succombed to cancer. Friends from work told of how he always had a smile upon his face, and with his interaction made you feel as if you were the most important person in the world. My wife told of how she is going to truly miss his humorous banter. Steve spoke with tears of how Tommy, for some reason, “chose” him as a friend. He quoted I Corinthians 13, substituting the word “love” with the name of our brother. “...Tommy is patient, kind, never haughty, or rude, or self-serving...Tommy never fails...” And many others spoke of the influence of this simple and loving man. A cousin stood to read words, carefully and lovingly transcribed from his brother Johnny. Characteristically, Johnny struggles with a limited vocabulary. But as Johnny sobbing in his pew, the words that were read were divinely eloquent.
When I stood to share a message, there was no need for me to pontificate. The life and love of Tommy had already preached a wonderful sermon. I read the passage from Luke, of the the child who offered his picnic basket to Jesus. He was just a little boy. And what he had to offer was not much. But he gave his very best, and he gave it from a heart of love. And it was accepted by Jesus. He took the few pieces of bread, and fish, and multiplied them, and fed the multitude. I told the crowd that Tommy was that little boy. He seemed at first glance not to have a lot. But he gave from a pure heart, and he gave his all. And God took what Tommy so graciously offered, and through the gentle life of this man we we all have been richly and abundantly blessed.
Tommy loved a raggedly old teddy bear he lendearingly named “Little Steve”. The aforementioned Steve gave it to Tommy while he was in the hospital. And Tommy was buried with Little Steve.
Tommy loved his cat, named Boots. Boots was brought to visit with him in the hospice every day. The cat would purr, and rub against him, and then snuggle up next to him in the hospital bed to take a leisurely nap. Several times I delighted to watch as Tommy would light up at the presence of Boots. And inevitably he would sing silly little songs to the appreciative cat. They had an amazing connection. Boots was given to Tommy on Christmas Day, by a homeless man as a simple expression of appreciation. The man was starving, and freezing, and Tommy took him into his house and gave him a place to stay. And he did this against the advice of others, including myself. Why? Because it was parcel to his simple heart to simply love others.

He liked to sing in the choir, even though he could not sing a note. I think he sang like an angel. He loved to come to men's breakfast, and eat about three plates of food. Given the opportunity, I'd cook him all he would want. I remember his long, never ending sentences, and wondering if he would ever stop talking. They don't seem so long anymore. I remember Tommy. He liked to smile and say, “There's my craaaazy preacher!” To have been Tommy's pastor, and friend, is a title of honor.
Tommy, I will see you again.
03.12.07 (7:05 pm) [
edit]
19
Comments
Need $200,000? Look In The Dumpster.
A Little Quip I Find To Be Humorous…
"Inside some of us is a thin person struggling to get out, but she can usually be sedated with a few pieces of chocolate cake." --------------------
And, The Moral Of The Story Is…
Craig Randall drove his garbage truck to Wendy’s restaurant to pick up their trash and drove away $200,000 richer. The previous week, he rummaged through the garbage and pulled a contest sticker off a cup. That time he won a free chicken sandwich. This time he found a cup and figured, “Hey, I’d like to get some free fries.” When he pulled the sticker off, it read: “Congratulations!&n bsp; You have won $200,000.” Someone who had eaten in the restaurant hadn’t taken the time to pull off the sticker before throwing it away. – www.kentcrockett.com
I’m interested. How do you think I can best use this little story as an illustration in a sermon or lesson?
03.12.07 (11:32 am) [
edit]
9
Comments
Restocking Fee? Call It Retail Thievery
Yesterday I purchased a portable dvd player at Circuit City. After the ensuing experience, I intend to shop elsewhere in the future.
When I got the item home, it was a chore to extract it from the thick clamshell casing. A razor blade was needed, and of course there was no way to extricate the player without completely destroying the packaging. Finally it was out of the box, and happily all of my fingers were still intact. It was time to play. I plugged it in and turned it on. The picture was great. However the sound was terrible. It could not be heard from more than two feet away, even at highest volume. I thought that surely there would be adjustments to remedy this issue. But after thoroughly studying the manual and trying all of the buttons, I decided the player would be unusable. So I re-wrapped it as best as possible, considering the container was sliced to shreds, and took it back to my friendly neighborhood Circuit City. This was within an hour of purchase, and this was when things got interesting.
The young lady at the return desk was surly. And after the upcoming experience, I can understand why. She asked me why I was returning the item, and I explained the terrible audio quality that rendered it unusable, even with earphones. She was accepting, and continued to type information into the computer. Then, with her scowly face and monotone, she casually mentioned there would be a 15% restocking fee. I asked why, since I was returning a defective item. She simply said it was "corporate policy", a despised phrase I heard often repeated in the next hour, and pointed to a poster above the desk of various and almost unreadable lawyerly jargon. I told her "No. I am not paying a restocking fee. Absolutely no." With irritation, she informed me she would have to get the manager. That was fine with me.
He came along, a busy man, and asked what was happening. She told her story, and I told mine. "Corporate policy", he said. "But you have sold me a piece of merchandise that is defecive through no fault of my own", I replied. "I'm sorry, sir. But I can't do anything about it. It's store policy."
By then, I was highly irritated. I felt I was being robbed by a big business that did not care about me. I told him a "restocking fee" was most inappropriate for an item that had a manufacturing flaw and surely would not be restocked. I mean, knowing the dvd player would not perform properly, surely a caring business would not rewrap it and sell it to an unsuspecting customer who would pay hard-earned money for it? "Corporate policy", he said. Exasperated, I looked over and saw several customers milling around. "Sir, I said loudly, you had best be careful about buying items from this store. If they have a manufacturing defect, these people will charge you to return the items." Then I called over to another person in line, "These people want to charge you to return their defective merchandise..."
The manager looked at me, then looked at the sour cashier, and said, "Give him his money and get him out of here." Full refund.
"Restocking fee" is a phrase meaning, "We as a business are quite comfortable stealing your money. We are ready and willing to profit from any pain and inconvenience we may inflict upon you. For you, the customer, we do not care." Circuit City, and businesses of similar ilk who mistreat their customers, will eventually pay dearly for such arrogance.
I learned, later, that Radio Shack and Walmart do not charge a restocking fee.
03.06.07 (10:23 am) [
edit]
30
Comments
Please Kick Me In The (Cigarette) Butt
I was walking out of the Hospice, and I said something that probably should not have been said. Well, it definitely was inappropriate. What made me say it? I don’t know. Maybe I was tired from an emotionally draining time with a friend. That would put a noble spin upon the matter. Perhaps it was an attempt at “black humour” that did not succeed. I know what it is, and I do appreciate a well-timed effort of levity about a dark subject. But I had best leave it to the professionals, of which I am not. What most likely happened at the moment was the emergence of the Jerk-From-Within. He almost always lurks somewhere near the tip of my tongue, and in most inappropriate times and ways will make his presence known. I know how to keep him away: introspection, the will to consider before I speak, and of course prayer. I was practicing none of those disciplines as I left the Hospice that day.
A lady, about my age, was sitting on the porch and smoking a cigarette. She had sunken cheeks, hollow eyes, and was obviously a patient. I was considering the absurdity of the scene as I walked by. She took another draw. I smiled, and said, “You’d best be careful. Those things can kill you.” There was a puzzled look on her face. I left.
Not good.
03.05.07 (10:06 am) [
edit]
21
Comments
Happy First Birthday To My Skylar
Happy Birthday!
Skylar Hope
(My Granddaughter)
Is One-Year-Old Today!!
Aside you I have sunshine
And stars glow with your every smile
In your visage I've found beauty
From within pours forth love
My heart already given to you
I am smitten
You are my life
My Little One.
- PaPa
03.01.07 (10:13 pm) [
edit]
16
Comments
Snobbishness Of Success
I recall the adage, “Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Usually I apply this to the political arena. The recent fall from power, of the Republican Party, is a clear example. In my opinion, Democrats did not win majorities in the House and Senate because of their promising agenda, but because of the dismal performance of the party in power. Republicans did not earn the right to re-election. They became focused upon power and forgot to serve. Thank God the American electorate understood and rejected the haughtiness of such self-absorbed, drunk-on-power elected officials. I am conservative to the core, but I would rather be represented by an earnest Democrat than a lying Republican. And so would the majority of Americans.
There is a snobbishness of success that can creep into any of us, if we are not careful, myself included. Since January I have been making a concerted effort to be more physically healthy. For two months I have been eating right and exercising with diligence. The results have been encouraging: I have lost 21 pounds, and my clothes have been fitting much better. Others have begun to notice and give compliments, which does wonders for my effort and ego. But I have been here before. I know it is as much of a challenge to maintain good health as to obtain it. Unless I am careful, at this moment of success with my diet and exercise, it is easy for me to look around at others and judge them in these matters. In the moment of success, I forget that weight is a constant struggle for me. I find myself proclaiming that the health problems of most people can be traced to poor diet and lack of exercise. I start looking at overweight people and judging them as lazy or undisciplined. There creeps within me an attitude, that usually I will not admit, that I am better than these people. And of course such is absolutely unfair, totally judgmental, and outside the attitude of a follower of Christ.
I will share another example of how quickly the snobbishness of success can take over our hearts. Last Thursday, as I came to the office, a man met me at the steps of the church. He was highly troubled with tears in his eyes. We sat down together and he poured out his story. He moved here from Michigan about six months ago, and has been unable to find work. He has no friends. He is lonely, tired, broke and absolutely defeated. I thought about him for a few moments, and decided to take a gamble and try to help. We had a good meal. We got him a prepaid cell phone, so interested employers could call back. We went to the Hands of Christ to obtain a couple of weeks of food, and then to DFACS to sign up for food stamps and other assistance. Next, we went to the Department of Labour so he could get some assistance in finding a job. Last, we rode around his neighbourhood as I pointed out places where he could make applications for work. All along I encouraged, and at the end of the day he was pumped up. On Sunday he came to church, where we all sought to be further encouraging. He spoke with great conviction about how much he was trusting the Lord and how very much he wanted to be a part of our church. Then, on Monday he called with great news- “I’ve got a job!” Both of us were quite excited.
Now, it is Thursday. I have not heard from him in several days. I wonder if I will see or hear from him again, now that things are looking up. I have seen it before: it is easier to seek God, speak eloquently of matters of faith, and be humble when life is tough. And it is just as easy to forget all of those billowy intentions when matters start going well. Unfortunately, such seems to be the general trend instead of the exception. This particular experiment is not yet finished.
I could look into the dictionary and find a good definition of humility. I know it is the opposite of snobbishness. It is a quality we all need. And life has a wonderful and painful way of impressing such lesson upon us. Better than to define it is to recognize it. Humility is to see an innate quality in the other human being that makes him your equal, no matter his level of accomplishment, appearance, or power. A humble person busies self in service toward others. Somewhere along the way he has learned to set aside the requirement for personal recognition and power. And this is parcel to the Christian message. I like I Peter 5:5, “All of you, clothe yourselves with humility toward one another, because, ‘God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.’" Jesus Christ has displayed for us the very embodiment of humility, from his incarnation, to his message, to his lifestyle. “Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your slave-- just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.” – Matthew 20:26-28.
Success is to breed humility.
03.01.07 (11:57 am) [
edit]
13
Comments