The Ethical Dilemmas of Trout Fishing In North Georgia

Friday I was introduced to the wonderful pastime of trout fishing.  Mr. Robb, a friend and paritioner, took me to the streams of North Georgia for a day of angling and fun.  It was quite a day.  However, the experience brought about some ethical questions and dilemmas I would like to pass along for your consideration and advice:

Ethical Dilemma # 1: It's Raining Fish
Apparently, trout are not native to these Georgia streams, at least not in numbers sufficient for all the anglers.  Thus enters the DNR, with several trout hatcheries throughout the northern part of the state.  We visited one.  It consists of big cement tanks of bubbling water, teeming with thousands and thousands of trout in various stages of maturity.  When they reach a point of sufficient size, a big water truck is pulled up beside the vats.  Fish are lifted by the dozens, with a huge net, promptly weighed and deposited into the truck.  When the truck is filled with a couple of tons, it takes off to an undisclosed destination.  There the fish are summarily dumped into the streams, to be quickly caught by awaiting fishermen.

As the truck was almost full and ready to leave, Mr. Robb signaled for me to jump into his pickup.  It was time to chase the tanker truck!  The driver of the truck knew how to negotiate the hills and narrow lanes along these mountains, since he negotiates them eveyday.  We followed the guy at breakneck speeds across the mountains.  And he knew we were following, which really was not against the law, and seemed to be playing some games with us.  One time he pulled over aside the road to casually check his load.  Another time he pulled into a drive, probably his house, probably to use the bathroom or make a sandwich- or both  We patiently waited, and followed.  Finally we followed him about five miles down a little gravel road.  He stopped, and dumped thousands of trout down the roadside and into the stream  They bounced off the banks and rocks on the way to the water, probably killing and maiming the majority.  This seemed a bit odd and cruel to me.  So we jumped out, hiked downstream a few hundred yards and started fishing.

I'm wondering at the true sport of such an excursion.  There is nothing natural about it.  Still I wanted to catch some fish.  And I did!

Dilemma # 2: The Silent Scream Of A Trout
When you catch the fish, you are going to put him on your stringer, take him home, and eat him.  Nothing wrong with that!  What would be wrong would be to catch him, injure him, and throw him back into the water to suffer and die.  Mr Robb thinks it cruel to string him through the gills, thinking he would needlessly suffer.  So he believes you should knock him in the head to quickly and painlessly end his misery  Also, this fast demise is supposed to preserve the delicasy of the meat.

I found out later you are supposed to do this with the back of a big, heavy pocketknife.  But, with the couple of fish I caught, I tried to humanely and ethically end their suffering with the nearest rock or stick.  It wasn't fast and it wasn't pretty.  It was a bloody mess.  I ended up beating the poor creatures to death.  I still feel guilty.

Dilemma # 3: How Not To Clean A Fish
Mr. Robb likes to quickly skin and clean the fish there by the riverbank.  He showed me how, and those of you who are squeemish need not read the next several sentences.  First you slit his throat below the gills, carefully leaving the head intact.  Then you slit his underbelly from tail to  head;  entrails and organs are removed with the fingers.  Then, the tricky part, is to snap back the head and peel off the skin.  Finally, you wash the big hunk of remaining white meat, and put into a ziplok bag.

Is it really good to throw all of those fish remains into the river?  Mr. Robb thinks it is a way to feed the other critters in and around the water.  It seems kind of like polluting to me.  And I was so bad at the process that he advised me to just throw away the formless and ugly mess left in my hands.

Dilemma # 4: The Math
A license is required, and I was able to secure mine over the internet.  The limit of catch is 8 trout per day, per person.  And if caught with an overage, a stiff fine will be given.  I think it means that once you catch 8 fish, you are to cease your angling.  We decided, for convenience sake, to interpret it that once you catch your eight fish, then you help the other guy to catch his eight fish.

I noticed several men fishing, with wife and two or three kids nearby occupied with other things or just looking bored.  I knew what they were there for, and it was not for companionship.  Thus, husband/dad could catch 40 fish, and attribute them among family members.  It reminds me of how Baptist preachers count the number of congregants on Sunday mornings.

Final Dilemma: Fishing Lies
Here's the reality: Mr Robb caught 12 fish, and I caught 3 weak-looking litte guys  It took me about 20 minutes to clean two, and Mr. Robb cleaned the rest in about 5 minutes. 

Today at church, several men asked how we did.  I gazed at my blistered hands and thought about my sore feet, and replied,  “We caught & cleaned 15 fish!  And, several were quite large!”  Technically, I was right.  Lightning did not strike, and the church did not fall in.  After all, I was only engaging in the time-honored tradition of fisherman's storytelling.  Nothing wrong with that, is there?

 



posted by: darksaber (reply)
post date: 06.19.06 (3:40 am)

I wonder if dilemma one also applies to deer. That would be interesting.

-Revan



posted by: fractalmom (reply)
post date: 06.19.06 (8:09 am)

dilemma #1
farming fish is a sticky wicket. what is the difference really, in buying a fish at the local walmart, that someone else has farmed, butchered and cleaned? you pay a bit less per pound.

chasing the truck perhaps made it a bit unfair for the fish, but that is a moral dilemma you will have to work out on your own LOL.

dilemma #2

lobster scream also. not silently either. i once had a whopping 5 pounder CLIMB OUT OF THE POT. now, i would like to say that i calmly caught him and carried him outside to the dock (we lived on the back bay of warwick cove in rhode island, and i had a dock 10 ft from my porch) and placed him lovingly in the water as a reward for his perserverance. however, the truth is i chased that sucker down and plopped him unceramoniously BACK into the pot, this time HOLDING DOWN the lid until he was quite thoroughly dead. and then ATE HIM.
dilemma #3
Mr Robb is right. the remains do feed the other wildlife. you can either leave the remains on the rocks for foraging animals, or plop them right back into the river.

dilemma #4

you are quite right my friend. it is the way of fishermen to be greedy.

dilemma #5

ask st. peter tonight in your prayers if HE ever lied about the fish he caught. :::evil grin::::

and WORDS OF ADVICE #1

next time you go trout fishing, go somewhere where there is a quiet little brook, stream, creek, and where rainbow trout are indiginous to the area.

and, where they DO NOT STOCK THE CREEK !!

because my friend, once you have actually fished a wild rainbow trout, you will never again enjoy the farm raised variety. not in eating, not in catching.

if you are ever lucky enough to visit the foothills of the sierra nevada range in northern california, try the trout fishing there.

i know of which i speak, having been raised there.

good hunting soul seeker !!



posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 06.19.06 (9:01 am)

Reply to: darksaber
I do not think that deer are raised and stocked in our forests, although I could be wrong. In my opinion, we have too many deer. I'd like to see the limits and hunting season expanded. I never hunt them, but I do hit one with my car sometimes. It ends up being an expensive deer.




posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 06.19.06 (9:04 am)

Reply to: fractalmom
I do not believe rainbow trout are indigenous anywhere around here. But, should the chance present itself, I'd like to test your theory. Our family spenta week in Lompoc, California, last year. We visited King's Canyon and Sequoia national parks, and thoroughly enjoyed it. Once you get out of LA, California is really a great place.



posted by: bawdy (reply)
post date: 06.19.06 (10:18 am)

The limit here is two per person. I heard two guys went...one got three, the other one. A game warden fined them. Two of them were watching. They were fined even more for lying about who caught the fish. It seems to me they'd let it slide. They must have a quota of offenders to catch, or else they're real pricks.



posted by: drforbush (reply)
post date: 06.20.06 (1:26 pm)

I went fishing in Texas once because my father-in-law wanted to go fishing. I suggested that we get a license, and he told me that they never come around and check. Sure enough the game warden showed up and my father-in-law dropped his rod and ran off. I stood there and took the ticket. Then afterward I was mocked for not dropping the rod and running.



Your Name:


Your Comment: