King Tut

Krystal, my oldest daughter, and I went to see the King Tut exhibit at the Atlanta Civic Center.  For some time I have been promising her an outing, and while other matters seemed to constantly get in the way, she has been insistent that I keep the promise.  Saturday we spent the afternoon together.  We dined at a favorite sub shop, spent several hours at the exhibit, and topped it off with a waffle cone at Bruster’s.  It was a nice time together.  I’m pleased and rather proud that she still wants to spend time with her dad.

It was billed as TUTANKHAMUN AND THE GOLDEN AGE OF THE PHARAOHS.  There was quite a crowd, although we were allowed to spend as much time as we would like with viewing.  Casually we strolled through several rooms of ancient Egyptian artifacts.

My impression?  Wow, that stuff is old!

As we perused artifacts from the different Egyptian dynasties, I absorbed it more as a purveyor of trivia than a careful student of history.  Here are some impressions:

So many of the busts showed the elongated skulls, characteristic of the people of that time and place.  I do not know if such is an anthropological feature or perhaps a deformity manipulated by wrappings.  But it seems I recall the same skull features from NBA basketball games.

Hatshepsut was a female Pharaoh, who ruled for twenty years of prosperity and enlightenment.  Apparently she dressed and behaved as a man, a necessity.  k. d. lang would be proud.

When I finished strolling through the detailed exhibits, I noticed what seemed an odd omission.  King Tutankhamen was nowhere to be found.  Displayed were crusty old photos of the original excavation.  And, there hung a neat 3-D depiction of the X-Ray of his mummy, used in an effort to theorize as to why he died at age 19.  The X-Ray appears to reveal a major breakage of his knee, perhaps the result of a fall or an incident of war.  It is surmised he could have died from the resulting infection.

I’ve searched the internet and found him.  Well, at least his head.
Photobucket He is on display in a museum in Egypt, appropriate I think, except that I paid $30 per ticket for a King Tut exhibit in Atlanta that did not include him! 

The security guard walked over and forced my daughter to erase some pictures she had taken of the displays, explaining that photographs were forbidden, and if we were unhappy with the policy to take it up with management.   Why can’t you take pictures?  Does National Geographic have a copyright on ancient Egyptian artifacts?  It seems to me such images would belong to posterity, and not to some copyright lawyer.  So, I’ve gone online and found some images, likely taken with cell phones, and therefore illegal.  They are proudly displayed below.

Long live rebellion to silly rules

Photobucket 

Photobucket 

Photobucket 

(My personal favorite)

Photobucket



posted by: OldSchool (reply)
post date: 03.16.09 (8:43 am)

Sounds like a nice day getting to spend time with your daughter no matter what it was you did!

I would agree that the name of the exhibit probably should have been more accurate to what you were going to get to see.

Loved the Steve Martin picture at the end. Was not really expecting it, so that made me laugh out loud.



posted by: beaverteeth (reply)
post date: 03.16.09 (8:47 am)

Born in Arizona got a condo made of stonea



posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 03.16.09 (10:01 am)

Reply to: beaverteeth
I imagine I could link to the Steve Martin video. Might be a nice touch?




posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 03.16.09 (10:02 am)

Reply to: OldSchool
We had fun, and there's no real disappointment with the program other than no getting to take pictures. Hey, Steve Martin made some really bad movies in the 80's....



posted by: OldSchool (reply)
post date: 03.16.09 (11:15 am)

Reply to: PastorDave
Yes, Steve Martin made some bad movies, but had a few good ones too.
I'm a much bigger fan of Chevy Chase, Bill Murray and John Candy myself.



posted by: barnabus1 (reply)
post date: 03.16.09 (12:31 pm)

The best part of it was the spending time w/ daughter!! Nice to take her to such an exhibit, and pretty rotten of them to say no pics!! Guess they afraid you might get a better pic than their photographers!!!



posted by: bawdy (reply)
post date: 03.16.09 (1:36 pm)

Posting contraband pics? You're quite the rebel! Don't tut tut the display simply due to the absence of Tut.



posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 03.16.09 (1:52 pm)

Reply to: OldSchool

Ah, but his work in Parenthood ranks in my top twenty favorite performances by an American actor.




posted by: RebeccaNelle (reply)
post date: 03.20.09 (3:17 pm)

Would you fully explain the following statement from your article:

"I do not know if such is an anthropological feature or perhaps a deformity manipulated by wrappings. But it seems I recall the same skull features from NBA basketball games."

Thank you. :-)




posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 03.20.09 (3:40 pm)

Reply to: RebeccaNelle
Fully explain?

Apparently, a physical feature of the people of Egypt, at least the nobility who have been immortalized through statues and mummies, is an elongated skull. It is prominent in appearance, where the skull takes on sort-of a melon shape as it moves toward the back. I understand there are people groups in parts of our world who consider this to be desirable, and actually work hard to form the skulls of their children accordingly with various bindings and wraps. Thus the soft skull of the child can be shaped.

Now, concerning my reference to NBA Basketball- it's simply a crass comment. I like to watch basketball, although I much prefer College ball because they play a better team sport. But as I observe these NBA guys, they are obviously unusual specimens of nature- being so tall and wide, lanky, and disproportionate to your average human. And some of them appear, to me, to have elongated skulls which may be similar to the ones in Egypt. Who knows? It is just a physical feature that a few people seem to have. It doesn't make them any better or worse than anyone else.

I have a fat face.




posted by: RebeccaNelle (reply)
post date: 03.21.09 (5:15 am)

Uh huh. Well. Your explanation appears a bit disingenuous to me. But I will take you at your word. I know that it SOUNDED like a racist comment, but I'm hoping for better from you, Pastor Dave. :-)



posted by: RebeccaNelle (reply)
post date: 03.21.09 (5:16 am)

My eyebrows went up at the k.d. lang comment also, but I let that one go by.



posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 03.21.09 (5:29 am)

Reply to: RebeccaNelle
Please explain how it could be understood to be racist...




posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 03.21.09 (5:42 am)

Reply to: RebeccaNelle
Concerning k. d. lang- It's been a while since I've seen or heard from her. So, I did a Google image search. You need to take a look at her. She may be the sweetest, nicest, most sincere and kind person around- I do not know. But she is a public figure, an entertainer, and so how she chooses to present herself is a fair subject for comment. She is a woman who chooses to present herself with a mannish appearance. Apparently similar to this female king of Egypt from centuries ago.

It has been a while since I've done a blog concerning views of homosexuality. One reason is because because it is almost impossible to have a conversation. Some who see things differently than myself come across almost militant and angry, and usually someone comes along and starts flaming my blog to the point that I no longer want to try to talk, and simply want the person to go away.




posted by: RebeccaNelle (reply)
post date: 03.21.09 (9:56 am)

I understood your comment to be racist by the implied connection between dark-skinned races and basketball players, actually, many of whom are of a negroid race, and of course, that particular race catches heck all the time for differences in body shape, head shape, physical ability as applied to sports, etc., etc. If I misunderstood, I apologize. And don't worry. I won't flame your blog. I am against homosexuality as my personal viewpoint, but I find it much more abhorrent for we as Christians to pass judgment - however slight and/or disguised as innocent comments - than whatever sin we happen to be judging. Again, if I misunderstood, I'm sorry. But the Bible tells us to shun even the appearance of evil, and I think that means to watch what we say that could be misconstrued as hatred, racism, etc. Hey, even the President got in trouble for saying he bowled like a Special Olympian! :-)





posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 03.21.09 (11:31 am)

Reply to: RebeccaNelle
I caught that comment from Obama, and was very tempted to criticize. Lots of bloggers, even at this site, were giving Bush a hard time for every misstep and misspoken word, even as they knew that sometimes it was simply looking for things to criticize simply because they did not like the guy or did not agree with his politics. It's easy to find fault when you basically do not like someone.


Your Name:


Your Comment: